DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE vs LALNUNCHAMI — 54/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 8(C),21,23,29. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc Crl - MISC. CASES

CNR: DLST010029042026

Filing Number

933/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

18-Special Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 8(C),21,23,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALNUNCHAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed accused Lalnunchami's application for extension of interim bail, finding insufficient medical grounds since her next scheduled skin treatment session was four weeks away. Additionally, the court forfeited the surety bond after the surety closed the FDR (Fixed Deposit Receipt) on the same day it was furnished to court without intimation, and issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) against the accused with directions to attach the surety amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed accused Lalnunchami's application for extension of interim bail, finding insufficient medical grounds since her next scheduled skin treatment session was four weeks away. Additionally, the court forfeited the surety bond after the surety closed the FDR (Fixed Deposit Receipt) on the same day it was furnished to court without intimation, and issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) against the accused with directions to attach the surety amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case