STATE vs DEEPAK @ GOLU AND ORS — 202/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34,325,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLST010027372024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-07-2023

Filing Number

1255/2024

Filing Date

18-07-2023

Registration No

202/2024

Registration Date

27-03-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

49-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

91

Police Station

Ambedkar Nagar

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 34,325,506

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

DEEPAK @ GOLU AND ORS

RAMESH

LEKHRAJ

RAGHURAJ

Hearing History

Judge: 49-Principal District and Sessions Judge

15-04-2026

Disposed

14-03-2026

ORDER (Criminal)

02-03-2026

Final Arguments (Criminal)

12-02-2026

Final Arguments (Criminal)

20-01-2026

Final Arguments (Criminal)

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Summary of Case 202/2024 (State v. Deepak @ Golu & Ors.) The court acquitted all four accused persons—Deepak @ Golu, Ramesh, Lekhraj, and Raghuraj—of charges under Sections 325/506/34 IPC (voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and common intention) in FIR No. 91/2023. Their existing bail bonds were cancelled and sureties discharged; they were directed to furnish fresh bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with one surety for six months under Section 437A CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 202/2024 (State v. Deepak @ Golu & Ors.) The court acquitted all four accused persons—Deepak @ Golu, Ramesh, Lekhraj, and Raghuraj—of charges under Sections 325/506/34 IPC (voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and common intention) in FIR No. 91/2023. Their existing bail bonds were cancelled and sureties discharged; they were directed to furnish fresh bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with one surety for six months under Section 437A CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case