STATE vs JAI SURI — 411/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLST010027332026

Filing Number

841/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

411/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

6-Additional Sessions Judge-02

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

337

Police Station

Hauz Khas

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAI SURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case 411/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to builder Jai Suri in a cheating case (Section 420 IPC) involving an alleged failure to execute a sale deed for a ₹2.25 crore flat after receiving ₹1.15 crore, despite transferring it to a third party. The court found the dispute fundamentally contractual in nature; the agreement itself contained penalty clauses for breach, and ongoing business dealings between parties undermined fraud allegations. Since evidence is documentary and custodial interrogation unnecessary, the court deemed civil remedies appropriate and released Suri on ₹50,000 bail with conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 411/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 411/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to builder Jai Suri in a cheating case (Section 420 IPC) involving an alleged failure to execute a sale deed for a ₹2.25 crore flat after receiving ₹1.15 crore, despite transferring it to a third party. The court found the dispute fundamentally contractual in nature; the agreement itself contained penalty clauses for breach, and ongoing business dealings between parties undermined fraud allegations. Since evidence is documentary and custodial interrogation unnecessary, the court deemed civil remedies appropriate and released Suri on ₹50,000 bail with conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case