STATE vs SHILA KUMARI — 379/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,316(2),80,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLST010024572026
Filing Number
779/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
379/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket
Judge
6-Additional Sessions Judge-02
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
Saket
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHILA KUMARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Shila Kumari (379/2026) The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Shila Kumari, sister-in-law of a deceased woman who died by suicide in a dowry-related case. The court found that allegations against her were general in nature, she was absent at the time of the incident, no prior complaints existed against her, and the primary accused (the husband) was already in custody. Bail was granted with conditions including cooperation with investigation, a personal bond of Rs. 30,000, and restrictions on leaving the country or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge-02
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge-02
-
10-Apr-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge-02
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge-02
-
16-Mar-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 379/2026
Case Summary: State v. Shila Kumari (379/2026) The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Shila Kumari, sister-in-law of a deceased woman who died by suicide in a dowry-related case. The court found that allegations against her were general in nature, she was absent at the time of the incident, no prior complaints existed against her, and the primary accused (the husband) was already in custody. Bail was granted with conditions including cooperation with investigation, a personal bond of Rs. 30,000, and restrictions on leaving the country or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts