DRI vs KULWINDER RAM alias KINDA — 390/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 29,23. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLST010024372026

Filing Number

774/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

390/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

18-Special Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 29,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KULWINDER RAM alias KINDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the bail application of Kulwinder Ram @ Kinda, who was accused of conspiring to smuggle 24 liters of heroin hidden in juice cartons imported from Afghanistan-Iran. The court found sufficient evidence linking him to the conspiracy through phone communications with co-accused, a mobile number registered in a fake name but used by the accused, and incriminating documents recovered from his phone. Given the grave nature of the offense, his prior drug trafficking conviction, and his inability to overcome Section 37 NDPS requirements, the court rejected bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Special Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 390/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the bail application of Kulwinder Ram @ Kinda, who was accused of conspiring to smuggle 24 liters of heroin hidden in juice cartons imported from Afghanistan-Iran. The court found sufficient evidence linking him to the conspiracy through phone communications with co-accused, a mobile number registered in a fake name but used by the accused, and incriminating documents recovered from his phone. Given the grave nature of the offense, his prior drug trafficking conviction, and his inability to overcome Section 37 NDPS requirements, the court rejected bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case