DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE vs LUZ MARINA BENITEZ ROSELLY — 381/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 21,23. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th June 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLST010024192026
Filing Number
766/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
381/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket
Judge
18-Special Judge
Decision Date
04th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
Respondent(s)
LUZ MARINA BENITEZ ROSELLY
Hearing History
Judge: 18-Special Judge
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-05-2026 | For Bail |
| 08-05-2026 | For Bail |
| 23-04-2026 | For Bail |
| 07-04-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: DRI v. Luz Marina Benitez Roselly (Bail Application 381/2026) The Special Judge dismissed the bail application of Brazilian national Luz Marina Benitez Roselly, who was arrested at Delhi airport on 25.03.2024 after concealing 123 capsules containing 958.4 grams of cocaine hydrochloride in her body. The court rejected the accused's contentions regarding procedural violations—including language barriers, incomplete witness presence, and delayed sample submission—finding these to be trial issues rather than bail grounds. The court held that Section 37 NDPS Act embargo applied and no change in circumstances had occurred since the previous bail dismissal on 10.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: DRI v. Luz Marina Benitez Roselly (Bail Application 381/2026) The Special Judge dismissed the bail application of Brazilian national Luz Marina Benitez Roselly, who was arrested at Delhi airport on 25.03.2024 after concealing 123 capsules containing 958.4 grams of cocaine hydrochloride in her body. The court rejected the accused's contentions regarding procedural violations—including language barriers, incomplete witness presence, and delayed sample submission—finding these to be trial issues rather than bail grounds. The court held that Section 37 NDPS Act embargo applied and no change in circumstances had occurred since the previous bail dismissal on 10.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts