STATE vs LOKESH alias LUCKY — 338/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,307,120B. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLST010021102026
Filing Number
681/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
338/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket
Judge
18-Special Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
391
Police Station
Tigri
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.LOKESH alias LUCKY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: State vs. Lokesh alias Lucky (Bail Application 338/2026) The court dismissed Lokesh's bail application in a murder case arising from the August 2020 death of Kunal in JJ Colony, Delhi. The applicant was accused of conspiring to murder Kunal and attacking eyewitness Sunny due to prior enmity. The court found sufficient evidence including eyewitness testimony naming Lokesh as the prime accused, CCTV footage of the assault, and CDR analysis establishing his associates' presence at the crime scene. Despite arguments of false implication and lack of evidence, the court rejected bail citing the serious nature of the allegations, witness intimidation threats, and the applicant's conduct, keeping him in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
28-Feb-2026
For Bail
Special Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 338/2026
Case Summary: State vs. Lokesh alias Lucky (Bail Application 338/2026) The court dismissed Lokesh's bail application in a murder case arising from the August 2020 death of Kunal in JJ Colony, Delhi. The applicant was accused of conspiring to murder Kunal and attacking eyewitness Sunny due to prior enmity. The court found sufficient evidence including eyewitness testimony naming Lokesh as the prime accused, CCTV footage of the assault, and CDR analysis establishing his associates' presence at the crime scene. Despite arguments of false implication and lack of evidence, the court rejected bail citing the serious nature of the allegations, witness intimidation threats, and the applicant's conduct, keeping him in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts