STATE vs SHER SINGH RAWAT — 308/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLST010018462026

Filing Number

640/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

308/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

6-Additional Sessions Judge-02

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

342

Police Station

Saket

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,34
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHER SINGH RAWAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

    The court dismissed Sher Singh Rawat's fourth bail application in a murder case (FIR 342/2022). The accused argued that most prosecution witnesses had not supported the case and all material witnesses had been examined, but the court found no grounds for release, noting the trial was near completion, a key witness (PW-8) had identified him as an assailant, and the High Court had already rejected identical grounds in July 2025 with no change in circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Order

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Order

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 308/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Sher Singh Rawat's fourth bail application in a murder case (FIR 342/2022). The accused argued that most prosecution witnesses had not supported the case and all material witnesses had been examined, but the court found no grounds for release, noting the trial was near completion, a key witness (PW-8) had identified him as an assailant, and the High Court had already rejected identical grounds in July 2025 with no change in circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case