STATE vs JUHI SINGH — 18/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406,34. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th April 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLST010001072026
Filing Number
38/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket
Judge
779-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
481
Police Station
Tigri
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.JUHI SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to Juhi Singh and three co-accused under Section 482 BNSS in an FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC (offences punishable up to 7 years). The Investigation Officer conceded that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as the applicants had already cooperated and joined the investigation. The court found no reasonable apprehension of arrest, accepted the accused's undertaking to cooperate as required, and disposed of all bail applications accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
For Bail
Special Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
For Bail
Special Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge -SC-Rc
-
09-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge -SC-Rc
-
07-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to Juhi Singh and three co-accused under Section 482 BNSS in an FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC (offences punishable up to 7 years). The Investigation Officer conceded that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as the applicants had already cooperated and joined the investigation. The court found no reasonable apprehension of arrest, accepted the accused's undertaking to cooperate as required, and disposed of all bail applications accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts