PRAMJIT SINGH vs AJAY GOYAL — 2863/2016
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 151. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 12th May 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLSH010080772016
Filing Number
4244/2016
Filing Date
09-12-2016
Registration No
2863/2016
Registration Date
14-12-2016
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD
Judge
464-Principal District and Sessions Judge - Shahdara District
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAMJIT SINGH
Adv. a
Respondent(s)
AJAY GOYAL
Hearing History
Judge: 464-Principal District and Sessions Judge - Shahdara District
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-04-2026 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Pramjit Singh v. Ajay Goyal (CS 2863/2016) The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 4 lakhs, finding insufficient evidence of the alleged loan. Though the plaintiff claimed he advanced the amount in three cash installments for a film investment, he failed to produce the original loan agreement dated 05.06.2015 and did not mention witnesses in his original plaint. The court found the testimonies of two witnesses introduced only during trial were unreliable and lacked material details about payment circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Pramjit Singh v. Ajay Goyal (CS 2863/2016) The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 4 lakhs, finding insufficient evidence of the alleged loan. Though the plaintiff claimed he advanced the amount in three cash installments for a film investment, he failed to produce the original loan agreement dated 05.06.2015 and did not mention witnesses in his original plaint. The court found the testimonies of two witnesses introduced only during trial were unreliable and lacked material details about payment circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts