SHYAM NANDAN JHA vs BRP ENTERPRISES — 115/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.
Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: DLSH010028592023
e-Filing Number
10-05-2023
Filing Number
1184/2023
Filing Date
10-May-2023
Registration No
115/2023
Registration Date
11-May-2023
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD
Judge
111-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Anand Vihar
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAM NANDAN JHA
Adv. SHYAM NANDAN JHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BRP ENTERPRISES
-
2.MR. BATESHWAR JHA
-
3.MR. RUPESH JAISWAL
-
4.MS POOJA
-
5.STATE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy Of Order
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judgment
Case Summary: 115/2023 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the revision petition and upheld the lower court's dismissal of the cheating complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. The court found that the complaint failed to disclose essential ingredients of cheating (Sections 420/406 IPC), particularly the absence of dishonest intention at inception of the transaction. Key Reasoning: While the complainant lent ₹7,80,000 to respondent no.2 and received four dishonored cheques, the court noted the complainant had no dealings with other respondents (nos.3 & 4) and admitted this during cross-examination. The mere closure of a bank account and cheque dishonor, without evidence of initial fraudulent intent, do not constitute criminal cheating. The court rejected the complainant's reliance on precedents, emphasizing that criminal proceedings would constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy Of Order
-
19-Mar-2026
Order
Additional Sessions Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Copy Of Order
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Copy Of Order
-
24-Sep-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
08-Aug-2025
Copy Of Order
-
08-Aug-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
27-May-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
08-May-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Copy Of Order
-
12-Dec-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Copy Of Order
-
24-Oct-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Copy Of Order
-
01-Oct-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
07-Sep-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
16-Jul-2024
Copy Of Order
-
16-Jul-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
Copy Of Order
-
06-Jun-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
21-May-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2024
Copy Of Order
-
29-Apr-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
03-Apr-2024
Copy Of Order
-
03-Apr-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Copy Of Order
-
01-Mar-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Copy Of Order
-
24-Jan-2024
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
Copy Of Order
-
08-Nov-2023
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
05-Oct-2023
Copy Of Order
-
05-Oct-2023
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2023
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
18-Jul-2023
Copy Of Order
-
18-Jul-2023
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2023
Copy Of Order
-
12-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 115/2023
Case Summary: 115/2023 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the revision petition and upheld the lower court's dismissal of the cheating complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. The court found that the complaint failed to disclose essential ingredients of cheating (Sections 420/406 IPC), particularly the absence of dishonest intention at inception of the transaction. Key Reasoning: While the complainant lent ₹7,80,000 to respondent no.2 and received four dishonored cheques, the court noted the complainant had no dealings with other respondents (nos.3 & 4) and admitted this during cross-examination. The mere closure of a bank account and cheque dishonor, without evidence of initial fraudulent intent, do not constitute criminal cheating. The court rejected the complainant's reliance on precedents, emphasizing that criminal proceedings would constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts