SMT BALWANTI vs RAJESH AND ORS — 9/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 223. Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CT Cases - COMPLAINT CASES
CNR: DLSH010025002025
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
e-Filing Number
02-05-2025
Filing Number
855/2025
Filing Date
03-05-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
03-05-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD
Judge
111-Additional Sessions Judge
FIR Details
Police Station
M.S. Park
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT BALWANTI
Adv. Subhash Chandra Lochakia
Respondent(s)
RAJESH AND ORS
SANJAY
YASH
SMT. SUSHMA
Hearing History
Judge: 111-Additional Sessions Judge
Prosecution Evidence
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 07-11-2025 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 02-09-2025 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 14-07-2025 | Misc./ Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Balwanti v. Rajesh and Others (CT Case 09/2025) The court dismissed the complainant's application for FIR registration under Section 175(3) BNSS in a caste-based harassment case. The complainant alleged that respondents used derogatory casteist remarks and physically threatened her on 02.03.2025. However, the court found that: (1) neighboring witnesses confirmed an altercation occurred but denied hearing casteist remarks; (2) all evidence is within the complainant's knowledge; and (3) no custodial interrogation is necessary. The court granted the complainant an opportunity to present pre-summoning evidence on 17.07.2026 instead of directing police FIR registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Balwanti v. Rajesh and Others (CT Case 09/2025) The court dismissed the complainant's application for FIR registration under Section 175(3) BNSS in a caste-based harassment case. The complainant alleged that respondents used derogatory casteist remarks and physically threatened her on 02.03.2025. However, the court found that: (1) neighboring witnesses confirmed an altercation occurred but denied hearing casteist remarks; (2) all evidence is within the complainant's knowledge; and (3) no custodial interrogation is necessary. The court granted the complainant an opportunity to present pre-summoning evidence on 17.07.2026 instead of directing police FIR registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts