SMT BALWANTI vs RAJESH AND ORS — 9/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 223. Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

CT Cases - COMPLAINT CASES

CNR: DLSH010025002025

Prosecution Evidence

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

e-Filing Number

02-05-2025

Filing Number

855/2025

Filing Date

03-05-2025

Registration No

9/2025

Registration Date

03-05-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD

Judge

111-Additional Sessions Judge

FIR Details

Police Station

M.S. Park

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 223
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

SMT BALWANTI

Adv. Subhash Chandra Lochakia

Respondent(s)

RAJESH AND ORS

SANJAY

YASH

SMT. SUSHMA

Hearing History

Judge: 111-Additional Sessions Judge

16-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

16-01-2026

Misc./ Appearance

07-11-2025

Misc./ Appearance

02-09-2025

Misc./ Appearance

14-07-2025

Misc./ Appearance

Interim Orders

05-05-2025
COPY OF ORDER
14-07-2025
COPY OF ORDER
02-09-2025
COPY OF ORDER
07-11-2025
COPY OF ORDER
16-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
16-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Case Summary: Balwanti v. Rajesh and Others (CT Case 09/2025) The court dismissed the complainant's application for FIR registration under Section 175(3) BNSS in a caste-based harassment case. The complainant alleged that respondents used derogatory casteist remarks and physically threatened her on 02.03.2025. However, the court found that: (1) neighboring witnesses confirmed an altercation occurred but denied hearing casteist remarks; (2) all evidence is within the complainant's knowledge; and (3) no custodial interrogation is necessary. The court granted the complainant an opportunity to present pre-summoning evidence on 17.07.2026 instead of directing police FIR registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Balwanti v. Rajesh and Others (CT Case 09/2025) The court dismissed the complainant's application for FIR registration under Section 175(3) BNSS in a caste-based harassment case. The complainant alleged that respondents used derogatory casteist remarks and physically threatened her on 02.03.2025. However, the court found that: (1) neighboring witnesses confirmed an altercation occurred but denied hearing casteist remarks; (2) all evidence is within the complainant's knowledge; and (3) no custodial interrogation is necessary. The court granted the complainant an opportunity to present pre-summoning evidence on 17.07.2026 instead of directing police FIR registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case