NITIN KUMAR SHARMA vs AJAY GOYAL AND ANR. — 235/2017
Case under Recovery of Money Section 151. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 12th May 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLSH010018842017
Filing Number
867/2017
Filing Date
21-03-2017
Registration No
235/2017
Registration Date
22-03-2017
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD
Judge
464-Principal District and Sessions Judge - Shahdara District
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NITIN KUMAR SHARMA
Adv. Shubneet Gupta
Respondent(s)
AJAY GOYAL AND ANR.
Neeraj Goyal
Hearing History
Judge: 464-Principal District and Sessions Judge - Shahdara District
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 04-04-2026 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of plaintiff Nitin Kumar Sharma, finding that he had advanced Rs. 17,58,000 to defendants Ajay Goyal and Neeraj Goyal for a purported film production, with bank statements and cheque records proving all payments were received. The court rejected the defendants' counter-claim that Rs. 60 lakh received from third-party film production firms offset their debt, as the defendants failed to prove partnership interest in those firms. The court awarded the plaintiff Rs. 17,58,000 with 6% annual interest from September 23, 2014, dismissing the defendants' counter-claim entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of plaintiff Nitin Kumar Sharma, finding that he had advanced Rs. 17,58,000 to defendants Ajay Goyal and Neeraj Goyal for a purported film production, with bank statements and cheque records proving all payments were received. The court rejected the defendants' counter-claim that Rs. 60 lakh received from third-party film production firms offset their debt, as the defendants failed to prove partnership interest in those firms. The court awarded the plaintiff Rs. 17,58,000 with 6% annual interest from September 23, 2014, dismissing the defendants' counter-claim entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts