Sanjeev Kapoor vs Vikas Sharma — 62/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438&439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION

CNR: DLSH010015702026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

599/2026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD

Judge

108-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438&439

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjeev Kapoor

    Adv. Mahipal Singh Rawat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    The Delhi High Court (ASJ-04/Shahdara) allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Sanjeev Kapoor against Vikas Sharma on 17.04.2026. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 25,000 upon the revisionist to be paid to the respondent/complainant. The detailed reasoning for the decision is referenced in a separate order not provided in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court (ASJ-04/Shahdara) allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Sanjeev Kapoor against Vikas Sharma on 17.04.2026. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 25,000 upon the revisionist to be paid to the respondent/complainant. The detailed reasoning for the decision is referenced in a separate order not provided in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case