Smt usha vs state and Ors — 58/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 438/440. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION

CNR: DLSH010012712026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

493/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD

Judge

108-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 438/440

Petitioner(s)

Smt usha

Adv. Ishank Shukla

Respondent(s)

state and Ors

Hearing History

Judge: 108-Additional Sessions Judge

07-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

Order

24-04-2026

Order

23-04-2026

Order

17-04-2026

Misc./ Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Case Summary: Cr. Rev. 58/2026 - Smt. Usha vs. State & Ors The Additional Sessions Judge upheld the trial court's dismissal of Usha's application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking FIR registration against Pawandeep Khurana for alleged cheating in a property transaction. The court found the dispute was fundamentally civil in nature (breach of sale agreement for a flat worth ₹23 lakhs) rather than criminal, noting that all evidence and the accused's identity were already within the complainant's knowledge, requiring no police investigation, and that a civil suit on the same matter was already pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

07-05-2026

COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr. Rev. 58/2026 - Smt. Usha vs. State & Ors The Additional Sessions Judge upheld the trial court's dismissal of Usha's application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking FIR registration against Pawandeep Khurana for alleged cheating in a property transaction. The court found the dispute was fundamentally civil in nature (breach of sale agreement for a flat worth ₹23 lakhs) rather than criminal, noting that all evidence and the accused's identity were already within the complainant's knowledge, requiring no police investigation, and that a civil suit on the same matter was already pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case