Navdeep Singh vs Kalu Ram — 156/2026
Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 169(1). Status: Misc. cases. Next hearing: 01st August 2026.
MISC DJ - MISC. CASES FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLSH010008232026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
539/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
156/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD
Judge
445-Presiding Officer-MACT
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Navdeep Singh
Adv. Nishi Kant Pandey
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kalu Ram
-
2.NAVDEEP SINGH
Case History
-
01-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Misc. cases
Presiding Officer-MACT
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
Case Summary: 156/2026 - Navdeep Singh vs. Kalu Ram Outcome: Case adjourned. The court ordered notice of the claim petition to be issued to respondent no.1 (driver) through all permissible modes, with witness list and petition copy annexed. Matter is scheduled for further proceedings on 09.06.2026. The court noted procedural irregularities including lack of proper service on respondent no.1 and absence of formal authorization documents for the advocate representing respondent no.2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Misc. cases
Presiding Officer-MACT
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Misc. cases
Presiding Officer-MACT
-
23-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Misc. cases
Presiding Officer-MACT
-
18-Feb-2026
Misc. cases
Presiding Officer-MACT
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2026
Case Summary: 156/2026 - Navdeep Singh vs. Kalu Ram Outcome: Case adjourned. The court ordered notice of the claim petition to be issued to respondent no.1 (driver) through all permissible modes, with witness list and petition copy annexed. Matter is scheduled for further proceedings on 09.06.2026. The court noted procedural irregularities including lack of proper service on respondent no.1 and absence of formal authorization documents for the advocate representing respondent no.2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts