STATE vs VIVEK KUMAR AND ANR. — 31/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),238(a),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLSH010006042026

Case disposed

Filing Number

226/2026

Filing Date

20-08-2025

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD

Judge

464-Principal District and Sessions Judge - Shahdara District

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

218

Police Station

Nand Nagari

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),238(a),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

VIVEK KUMAR AND ANR.

RAJIV ALIAS GOLI

Hearing History

Judge: 464-Principal District and Sessions Judge - Shahdara District

07-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Prosecution Evidence

13-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

25-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

16-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
COPY OF ORDER
07-04-2026
COPY OF JUDGMENT

Case Summary: State v. Vivek Kumar and Rajiv @ Goli (31/2026) Accused Vivek and Rajiv @ Goli were charged under Sections 109(1)/238(a) read with Section 3(5) BNS for allegedly stabbing complainant Mukesh with knives in April 2025. The court acquitted both accused, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt because the complainant—the key witness—turned hostile during trial, refused to identify the accused as assailants, and disowned his initial statement, while other prosecution witnesses provided only formal procedural evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

28-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
16-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
25-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
13-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
01-04-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Vivek Kumar and Rajiv @ Goli (31/2026) Accused Vivek and Rajiv @ Goli were charged under Sections 109(1)/238(a) read with Section 3(5) BNS for allegedly stabbing complainant Mukesh with knives in April 2025. The court acquitted both accused, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt because the complainant—the key witness—turned hostile during trial, refused to identify the accused as assailants, and disowned his initial statement, while other prosecution witnesses provided only formal procedural evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Shahdara, KKD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case