STATE vs THOMPSON APITI ALIAS EMEKA — 1693/2025

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Misc Crl - MISC. CASES

CNR: DLSE010137532025

Case disposed

Filing Number

7449/2025

Filing Date

12-12-2025

Registration No

1693/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

9-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

425

Police Station

Sun Light Colony

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 29
Foreigners Act 1946 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

THOMPSON APITI ALIAS EMEKA

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Additional Sessions Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

For Bail

07-03-2026

For Bail

28-02-2026

For Bail

23-02-2026

For Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Case Summary: State v. Thompson Apiti Alias Emeka (1693/2025) The court granted regular bail to accused Thompson Apiti @ Emeka in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The judge found that despite charges under NDPS Act sections 21/29 and the Foreigners Act, no contraband was recovered from the accused's possession, the prosecution's case relied solely on weak disclosure statements (inadmissible under law), and investigation was already complete with chargesheet filed. The accused was released on Rs. 50,000 personal bond with surety, subject to conditions including non-departure from India and court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

13-12-2025
COPY OF ORDER
08-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
29-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
28-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
07-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
16-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Thompson Apiti Alias Emeka (1693/2025) The court granted regular bail to accused Thompson Apiti @ Emeka in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The judge found that despite charges under NDPS Act sections 21/29 and the Foreigners Act, no contraband was recovered from the accused's possession, the prosecution's case relied solely on weak disclosure statements (inadmissible under law), and investigation was already complete with chargesheet filed. The accused was released on Rs. 50,000 personal bond with surety, subject to conditions including non-departure from India and court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case