STATE vs NITIN @ KAMAL — 2778/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 377,323,506. Status: Misc./ Appearance .. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLSE010100782016

Misc./ Appearance .

Next Hearing

13th July 2026

Filing Number

29583/2016

Filing Date

16-12-2016

Registration No

2778/2016

Registration Date

16-12-2016

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

4-Additional Sessions Judge POCSO

FIR Details

FIR Number

397

Police Station

Badarpur

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 377,323,506
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

NITIN @ KAMAL

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Additional Sessions Judge POCSO

25-04-2026

Misc./ Appearance .

13-03-2026

Misc./ Appearance .

21-02-2026

Misc./ Appearance .

12-01-2026

Final Arguments .

22-11-2025

Final Arguments .

Interim Orders

23-12-2016
COPY OF ORDER
07-01-2017
COPY OF ORDER
28-01-2017
COPY OF ORDER
01-02-2017
COPY OF ORDER
08-02-2017
COPY OF ORDER
30-03-2017
COPY OF ORDER
25-07-2017
COPY OF ORDER
22-08-2017
COPY OF ORDER
17-10-2017
COPY OF ORDER
05-12-2017
COPY OF ORDER
17-01-2018
COPY OF ORDER
21-03-2018
COPY OF ORDER

Case Summary: In this POCSO Special Court matter dated 21.03.2018, the case was adjourned to 18.07.2018 for RPE (Recording of Evidence). The court directed AIIMS Medical Superintendent to depute an alternative doctor conversant with PW Dr. Mukund Kumar's handwriting/signature and to send the MLC copy with summons, as the original witness had left AIIMS. Complainant's parents were discharged unexamined due to time constraints from 22 bail applications heard that day. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this POCSO Special Court matter dated 21.03.2018, the case was adjourned to 18.07.2018 for RPE (Recording of Evidence). The court directed AIIMS Medical Superintendent to depute an alternative doctor conversant with PW Dr. Mukund Kumar's handwriting/signature and to send the MLC copy with summons, as the original witness had left AIIMS. Complainant's parents were discharged unexamined due to time constraints from 22 bail applications heard that day. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case