RESHMA KHATOON AND ORS vs IQBAL — 947/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc DJ - MISC. CASES FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLSE010093402025

e-Filing Number

02-09-2025

Filing Number

4385/2025

Filing Date

04-Sep-2025

Registration No

947/2025

Registration Date

06-Sep-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

2-Po (Mact)-01

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RESHMA KHATOON AND ORS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IQBAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The MACT court dismissed the application by Reshma Khatoon seeking premature release of an FDR of Rs. 11,15,314 held in the name of her minor son Faizan. The court found that the applicant failed to provide supporting documents (such as fee slips) to justify the release for education purposes and noted that funds were instead intended for purchasing property in her daughter's name, raising doubts about utilizing the award for the minor's benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Po (Mact)-01

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  12. 06-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 04-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 947/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The MACT court dismissed the application by Reshma Khatoon seeking premature release of an FDR of Rs. 11,15,314 held in the name of her minor son Faizan. The court found that the applicant failed to provide supporting documents (such as fee slips) to justify the release for education purposes and noted that funds were instead intended for purchasing property in her daughter's name, raising doubts about utilizing the award for the minor's benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case