Sumit Pahwa vs MGI Infratech Pvt Ltd — 222/2025
Case under Permanent Injuction Section order22. Disposed: Uncontested--SATISFIED on 30th May 2026.
EX - EXECUTION
CNR: DLSE010086792025
e-Filing Number
15-08-2025
Filing Number
4090/2025
Filing Date
13-Aug-2025
Registration No
222/2025
Registration Date
13-Aug-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket
Judge
10-District Judge - 02
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SATISFIED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sumit Pahwa
Adv. Ganga Prasad Pant
Respondent(s)
-
1.MGI Infratech Pvt Ltd
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
Case 222/2025 Summary: The District Court dismissed Sumit Pahwa's execution petition against MGI Infratech Pvt Ltd after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. Pahwa's father, acting as his Special Power of Attorney holder, informed the court that the matter had been settled to satisfaction, and the respondents undertook to comply with their obligations. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge - 02
-
09-May-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge - 02
-
22-Apr-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge - 02
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge - 02
-
23-Jan-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
23-Jan-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge - 02
-
21-Nov-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge - 02
-
13-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 222/2025
Case 222/2025 Summary: The District Court dismissed Sumit Pahwa's execution petition against MGI Infratech Pvt Ltd after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. Pahwa's father, acting as his Special Power of Attorney holder, informed the court that the matter had been settled to satisfaction, and the respondents undertook to comply with their obligations. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts