Guddu vs HASIMUDDIN — 761/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166/140. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLSE010084572025

e-Filing Number

08-08-2025

Filing Number

3993/2025

Filing Date

11-Aug-2025

Registration No

761/2025

Registration Date

13-Aug-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

2-Po (Mact)-01

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166/140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Guddu

    Adv. IRSHAD

  2. 2.MEENU SHARMA

    Adv. IRSHAD

  3. 3.PRITI DEVI

    Adv. IRSHAD

  4. 4.SHALU

    Adv. IRSHAD

  5. 5.USHA DEVI

    Adv. IRSHAD

  6. 6.SHIPRA GHATAK

    Adv. IRSHAD

  7. 7.VIMLA DEVI

    Adv. IRSHAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HASIMUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    In MACT Case 761/25 (Guddu vs. Hasimuddin), the Delhi court disposed of the claim petition on 22.05.2026 after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal. The court accepted the withdrawal, recorded the counsel's statement separately, and ordered the case file be consigned to record room with documents returned to counsel upon filing photocopies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    Po (Mact)-01

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 761/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In MACT Case 761/25 (Guddu vs. Hasimuddin), the Delhi court disposed of the claim petition on 22.05.2026 after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal. The court accepted the withdrawal, recorded the counsel's statement separately, and ordered the case file be consigned to record room with documents returned to counsel upon filing photocopies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case