LARO DEVI AND ANR vs AMRESH KUMAR AND ORS — 1203/2024

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLSE010082702024

e-Filing Number

08-08-2024

Filing Number

3604/2024

Filing Date

12-Aug-2024

Registration No

1203/2024

Registration Date

13-Aug-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

2-Po (Mact)-01

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LARO DEVI AND ANR

    Adv. Jatin Kapur

  2. 2.KUMAR PRASAD YADAV

    Adv. Jatin Kapur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMRESH KUMAR AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: LARO DEVI AND ANR vs. AMRESH KUMAR AND ORS (1203/2024) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the petitioners' claim petition against the motorcycle owner's insurance company, finding the petitioners had concealed material facts and taken contradictory positions. The petitioners filed an FIR naming an unknown vehicle as the offender but later claimed the motorcycle driver's negligence in their insurance claim—a contradictory plea raised solely to obtain compensation. However, the tribunal directed that claimants are entitled to compensation from the State Legal Services Authority as the victim died in a hit-and-run accident with the offending vehicle remaining untraceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Po (Mact)-01

  4. 25-Sep-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 25-Sep-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  6. 03-Mar-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  7. 03-Mar-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  8. 13-Aug-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 13-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1203/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LARO DEVI AND ANR vs. AMRESH KUMAR AND ORS (1203/2024) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the petitioners' claim petition against the motorcycle owner's insurance company, finding the petitioners had concealed material facts and taken contradictory positions. The petitioners filed an FIR naming an unknown vehicle as the offender but later claimed the motorcycle driver's negligence in their insurance claim—a contradictory plea raised solely to obtain compensation. However, the tribunal directed that claimants are entitled to compensation from the State Legal Services Authority as the victim died in a hit-and-run accident with the offending vehicle remaining untraceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case