HARDEV KUMAR YADAV vs AMRESH KUMAR AND ORS — 1202/2024

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLSE010082692024

e-Filing Number

08-08-2024

Filing Number

3603/2024

Filing Date

12-Aug-2024

Registration No

1202/2024

Registration Date

13-Aug-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

2-Po (Mact)-01

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARDEV KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. Jatin Kapur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMRESH KUMAR AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: HARDEV KUMAR YADAV v. AMRESH KUMAR AND ORS (1202/2024) The MACT dismissed the petitioner's motor accident claim petition, finding the petitioner concealed material facts and raised contradictory pleas. The claimants filed an FIR against an unknown vehicle after a hit-and-run accident on 12.06.2024, but later sued the motorcycle owner's insurance company alleging the driver's negligence—without mentioning such negligence in their original police complaint. The tribunal held this contradictory stance was impermissible and taken solely to secure compensation. However, the court directed the claimants be entitled to compensation from the State Legal Services Authority under hit-and-run accident provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Po (Mact)-01

  4. 25-Sep-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 25-Sep-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  6. 03-Mar-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  7. 03-Mar-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  8. 13-Aug-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 13-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1202/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HARDEV KUMAR YADAV v. AMRESH KUMAR AND ORS (1202/2024) The MACT dismissed the petitioner's motor accident claim petition, finding the petitioner concealed material facts and raised contradictory pleas. The claimants filed an FIR against an unknown vehicle after a hit-and-run accident on 12.06.2024, but later sued the motorcycle owner's insurance company alleging the driver's negligence—without mentioning such negligence in their original police complaint. The tribunal held this contradictory stance was impermissible and taken solely to secure compensation. However, the court directed the claimants be entitled to compensation from the State Legal Services Authority under hit-and-run accident provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case