Maniram And Ors vs Raj Kumar Rastogi And Ors — 828/2024

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Status: Misc. cases. Next hearing: 12th October 2026.

Misc. cases Next hearing 12-Oct-2026

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLSE010045092024

e-Filing Number

30-04-2024

Filing Number

2040/2024

Filing Date

03-May-2024

Registration No

828/2024

Registration Date

17-May-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

2-Po (Mact)-01

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maniram And Ors

    Adv. tejveer singh

  2. 2.Gauri Shankar

    Adv. tejveer singh

  3. 3.Yatender Kumar

    Adv. tejveer singh

  4. 4.Anuj Kumar

    Adv. tejveer singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raj Kumar Rastogi And Ors

Case History

  1. 12-Oct-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case 828/2024 Summary The MACT case was adjourned to 12.10.2026. The petitioner was granted one week to file the certified copy of criminal record (which she failed to file despite four previous hearings), with her interest remaining closed until then. The petitioner and R2's counsel were directed to supply the insurance policy copy to the insurance company's counsel, after which the insurance company must file its written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  4. 25-Aug-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 25-Aug-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  6. 18-Mar-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  8. 08-Nov-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 08-Nov-2024

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  10. 17-May-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  11. 17-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 828/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 828/2024 Summary The MACT case was adjourned to 12.10.2026. The petitioner was granted one week to file the certified copy of criminal record (which she failed to file despite four previous hearings), with her interest remaining closed until then. The petitioner and R2's counsel were directed to supply the insurance policy copy to the insurance company's counsel, after which the insurance company must file its written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case