STATE vs LALIT — 701/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 21,29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th May 2026.

Bail Matters

CNR: DLSE010030892026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1535/2026

Filing Date

14-03-2026

Registration No

701/2026

Registration Date

14-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

9-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

172

Police Station

CRIME BRANCH-SOUTH EAST

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 21,29

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

LALIT

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Additional Sessions Judge

16-05-2026

Disposed

14-05-2026

For Bail

13-05-2026

For Bail

07-05-2026

For Bail

02-05-2026

For Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

16-05-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Case Summary: STATE vs. LALIT (701/2026) Decision: The court granted regular bail to accused Lalit in an NDPS drug case, finding that the 114 grams of heroin recovered from him constituted "intermediate quantity" rather than "commercial quantity," making Section 37 NDPS Act inapplicable. The court emphasized that recovery from co-accused cannot be aggregated with Lalit's recovery and noted investigation completion with chargesheet already filed. Conditions: Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety, subject to restrictions on leaving India, maintaining residential address disclosure, court appearance, witness non-contact, and phone number verification with investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STATE vs. LALIT (701/2026) Decision: The court granted regular bail to accused Lalit in an NDPS drug case, finding that the 114 grams of heroin recovered from him constituted "intermediate quantity" rather than "commercial quantity," making Section 37 NDPS Act inapplicable. The court emphasized that recovery from co-accused cannot be aggregated with Lalit's recovery and noted investigation completion with chargesheet already filed. Conditions: Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety, subject to restrictions on leaving India, maintaining residential address disclosure, court appearance, witness non-contact, and phone number verification with investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case