STATE vs SAFIK ALI @ BABU HAKLA BABU — 432/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 20,29. Disposed: Uncontested--CANCELLED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc Crl - MISC. CASES

CNR: DLSE010030712026

Filing Number

1525/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

432/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

9-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CANCELLED

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

923

Police Station

Okhla Indl. Area

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 20,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAFIK ALI @ BABU HAKLA BABU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Safik Ali @ Babu Hakla Babu (432/2026) The court allowed the accused's application to cancel the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against him in this NDPS Act case (FIR 923/2023). The accused's counsel submitted that his non-appearance was unintentional and bonafide, as he had traveled to his native place to care for his ailing mother. The court accepted this explanation and cancelled the NBW and surety notice, but issued a warning to the accused to appear punctually at all future hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 432/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Safik Ali @ Babu Hakla Babu (432/2026) The court allowed the accused's application to cancel the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against him in this NDPS Act case (FIR 923/2023). The accused's counsel submitted that his non-appearance was unintentional and bonafide, as he had traveled to his native place to care for his ailing mother. The court accepted this explanation and cancelled the NBW and surety notice, but issued a warning to the accused to appear punctually at all future hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case