STATE vs SACHIN KUMAR VERMA — 692/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 20,61,85. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLSE010030582026
Filing Number
1516/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
692/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket
Judge
9-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
630
Police Station
Govind Puri
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SACHIN KUMAR VERMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The court granted regular bail to Sachin Kumar Verma in an NDPS case involving 1.130 kg of ganja (intermediate quantity) after he had been in judicial custody since December 26, 2025. The court found that investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, no custodial interrogation was needed, the accused had no prior NDPS involvement, and Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply to intermediate quantities. Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-communication with prosecution witnesses, regular court appearance, and reporting address changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 692/2026
The court granted regular bail to Sachin Kumar Verma in an NDPS case involving 1.130 kg of ganja (intermediate quantity) after he had been in judicial custody since December 26, 2025. The court found that investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, no custodial interrogation was needed, the accused had no prior NDPS involvement, and Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply to intermediate quantities. Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-communication with prosecution witnesses, regular court appearance, and reporting address changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts