STATE vs JEESHAN ALI — 674/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 221,132,318(4),61(2)3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLSE010030122026
Filing Number
1491/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
674/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket
Judge
9-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
CRIME BRANCH-SOUTH EAST
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Respondent(s)
JEESHAN ALI
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 13-03-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Jeeshan Ali (674/2026) The court dismissed Jeeshan Ali's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged illegal issuance of traffic stickers/badges and obstruction of public servants. The court found that Ali allegedly headed an organized crime syndicate that defrauded Delhi Traffic Police, transporters, and drivers, with financial proceeds traced to his wife's and partner's accounts. Given the early investigative stage, ongoing identification of syndicate members, Ali's habitual criminal history (three prior cases involving extortion and cheating), and the necessity for custodial interrogation, the court concluded there was substantial risk of witness tampering and recidivism, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State v. Jeeshan Ali (674/2026) The court dismissed Jeeshan Ali's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged illegal issuance of traffic stickers/badges and obstruction of public servants. The court found that Ali allegedly headed an organized crime syndicate that defrauded Delhi Traffic Police, transporters, and drivers, with financial proceeds traced to his wife's and partner's accounts. Given the early investigative stage, ongoing identification of syndicate members, Ali's habitual criminal history (three prior cases involving extortion and cheating), and the necessity for custodial interrogation, the court concluded there was substantial risk of witness tampering and recidivism, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts