STATE vs ANKRISH MAHAJAN — 414/2026

Case Summary: State v. Ankrish Mahajan (414/2026) The court allowed Ankrish Mahajan's application to modify his bail conditions, holding that courts cannot impose restrictive conditions beyond security and surety for bailable offences. The trial court's requirement that the 22-year-old accused seek prior permission to travel abroad was deemed unlawful under Section 478 BNSS, as the accused faced only bailable charges (BNS §79, 351(2)) and such travel restrictions effectively constructively denied bail to someone employed in Dubai. The Additional Sessions Judge revoked the condition, allowing the applicant unrestricted movement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.