STATE vs SUNNY ALIAS SUNY PASWAN — 663/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,3. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLSE010028992026

Filing Number

1441/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

663/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

9-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12167

Police Station

Hazrat Nizamuddin

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNNY ALIAS SUNY PASWAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: STATE vs. SUNNY ALIAS SUNY PASWAN (Bail Matter 663/2026) The court granted regular bail to accused Sunny Paswan, charged under sections 305(b)/317(2) BNS for alleged motorcycle theft. The court found that investigation was complete, stolen property (motorcycle DL 3SFR 8106) had been recovered, and no further custodial interrogation was required, making continued detention unjustified. Bail was granted on Rs. 20,000 personal bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-contact with complainant, regular court appearance, and mobile phone monitoring by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 663/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STATE vs. SUNNY ALIAS SUNY PASWAN (Bail Matter 663/2026) The court granted regular bail to accused Sunny Paswan, charged under sections 305(b)/317(2) BNS for alleged motorcycle theft. The court found that investigation was complete, stolen property (motorcycle DL 3SFR 8106) had been recovered, and no further custodial interrogation was required, making continued detention unjustified. Bail was granted on Rs. 20,000 personal bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-contact with complainant, regular court appearance, and mobile phone monitoring by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case