STATE vs NEERAJ KUMAR — 618/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,308. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Bail Matters

CNR: DLSE010027582026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1354/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

618/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

9-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

377

Police Station

Sarita Vihar

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 323,341,308

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

NEERAJ KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Additional Sessions Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

For Bail

13-03-2026

For Bail

12-03-2026

For Bail

09-03-2026

For Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

The court granted regular bail to accused Neeraj Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323/341/308 (simple hurt, wrongful restraint, and act endangering life), finding that investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, no further custodial interrogation required, injuries were simple in nature, and the complainant had no objection. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount, subject to conditions including non-contact with the complainant, no evidence tampering, regular court attendance, and mobile phone tracking by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
13-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
16-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to accused Neeraj Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323/341/308 (simple hurt, wrongful restraint, and act endangering life), finding that investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, no further custodial interrogation required, injuries were simple in nature, and the complainant had no objection. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount, subject to conditions including non-contact with the complainant, no evidence tampering, regular court attendance, and mobile phone tracking by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case