STATE vs NEERAJ KUMAR — 618/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,308. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLSE010027582026
Filing Number
1354/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
618/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket
Judge
9-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
377
Police Station
Sarita Vihar
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Respondent(s)
NEERAJ KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 13-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 12-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 09-03-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted regular bail to accused Neeraj Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323/341/308 (simple hurt, wrongful restraint, and act endangering life), finding that investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, no further custodial interrogation required, injuries were simple in nature, and the complainant had no objection. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount, subject to conditions including non-contact with the complainant, no evidence tampering, regular court attendance, and mobile phone tracking by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court granted regular bail to accused Neeraj Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323/341/308 (simple hurt, wrongful restraint, and act endangering life), finding that investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, no further custodial interrogation required, injuries were simple in nature, and the complainant had no objection. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount, subject to conditions including non-contact with the complainant, no evidence tampering, regular court attendance, and mobile phone tracking by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts