STATE vs SUSHILA DEVI — 454/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section UNKNOWN. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th May 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLSE010020762026
Filing Number
997/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
454/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket
Judge
24-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Hazrat Nizamuddin
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUSHILA DEVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to Sushila Devi under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in FIR No. 20/2026. The prosecution stated that custodial interrogation of the accused was unnecessary since she is a woman and investigative purposes could be served through the co-accused Thakur Das. She was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount and must cooperate with the investigation and notify the IO of any address changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
12-May-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
06-May-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 454/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to Sushila Devi under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in FIR No. 20/2026. The prosecution stated that custodial interrogation of the accused was unnecessary since she is a woman and investigative purposes could be served through the co-accused Thakur Das. She was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount and must cooperate with the investigation and notify the IO of any address changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts