DEVENDER PANDYA vs SHAHID MALIK — 168/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Status: Misc. cases. Next hearing: 05th November 2026.

Misc. cases Next hearing 05-Nov-2026 in ~2 months

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLSE010019262025

e-Filing Number

21-02-2025

Filing Number

941/2025

Filing Date

21-Feb-2025

Registration No

168/2025

Registration Date

24-Feb-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

2-Po (Mact)-01

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVENDER PANDYA

    Adv. MOHD QADEER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAHID MALIK

Case History

  1. 05-Nov-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

    CASE SUMMARY: 11 MACT 168/25 - Devender Pandya v. Shahid Malik The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal framed two main issues: whether the petitioner suffered injuries in a road accident on 23.08.2024 due to rash/negligent driving of vehicle DL-5CV-9132 (owned by respondent R1 and insured with R2), and whether compensation is due. Following Supreme Court precedent requiring commission evidence when insurers dispute liability, the tribunal appointed a Local Commissioner to record evidence from both sides. Evidence must be concluded within 30 days (extendable by 30 days); the insurance company bears commission costs and petitioner's evidence costs; and final arguments are scheduled for 05.11.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  4. 24-Sep-2025

    Copy Of Order

  5. 24-Sep-2025

    Misc. cases

    Po (Mact)-01

  6. 24-Feb-2025

    Copy Of Order

  7. 24-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: 11 MACT 168/25 - Devender Pandya v. Shahid Malik The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal framed two main issues: whether the petitioner suffered injuries in a road accident on 23.08.2024 due to rash/negligent driving of vehicle DL-5CV-9132 (owned by respondent R1 and insured with R2), and whether compensation is due. Following Supreme Court precedent requiring commission evidence when insurers dispute liability, the tribunal appointed a Local Commissioner to record evidence from both sides. Evidence must be concluded within 30 days (extendable by 30 days); the insurance company bears commission costs and petitioner's evidence costs; and final arguments are scheduled for 05.11.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case