RAMESHWAR BANSAL vs DDA AND ANR — 372/2017
Case under Recovery of Money Section ORDINARY. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.
CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLSE010017592017
Filing Number
1019/2017
Filing Date
24-01-2007
Registration No
372/2017
Registration Date
24-01-2007
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket
Judge
10-District Judge - 02
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESHWAR BANSAL
Respondent(s)
DDA AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: 10-District Judge - 02
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 28-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 04-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 19-12-2025 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 372/2017: Rameshwar Bansal v. DDA The District Judge dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs.23,60,475/- with costs, finding that the plaintiff failed to prove outstanding payments owed by DDA for a shopping centre construction project. The court determined that the plaintiff had accepted the final bill of Rs.84,98,112/-, received Rs.83,59,979/- in payments plus full security deposit refund, and was estopped from subsequently claiming additional amounts through prior written acceptances without protest, making his claims for unpaid work and watch-and-ward charges unrecoverable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 372/2017: Rameshwar Bansal v. DDA The District Judge dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs.23,60,475/- with costs, finding that the plaintiff failed to prove outstanding payments owed by DDA for a shopping centre construction project. The court determined that the plaintiff had accepted the final bill of Rs.84,98,112/-, received Rs.83,59,979/- in payments plus full security deposit refund, and was estopped from subsequently claiming additional amounts through prior written acceptances without protest, making his claims for unpaid work and watch-and-ward charges unrecoverable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts