STATE vs SHIV RAJ RAI — 257/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 20,29. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc Crl - MISC. CASES

CNR: DLSE010017382026

Filing Number

852/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

257/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

9-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

142

Police Station

Amar Colony

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 20,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIV RAJ RAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case 257/2026 Summary STATE v. SHIV RAJ RAI (NDPS Act charges): The court allowed accused Shiv Raj Rai's application to reduce bail surety conditions from Rs. 50,000 with two sureties to Rs. 50,000 with one surety, considering his youth and poor financial status. All other bail conditions remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance .

    Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Misc./ Appearance .

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Misc./ Appearance .

    Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 257/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 257/2026 Summary STATE v. SHIV RAJ RAI (NDPS Act charges): The court allowed accused Shiv Raj Rai's application to reduce bail surety conditions from Rs. 50,000 with two sureties to Rs. 50,000 with one surety, considering his youth and poor financial status. All other bail conditions remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case