M/S JAIVAT CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. vs M/S C.L. MICROMED PVT. LTD. — 64/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section RECOVERY. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLSE010007272026

e-Filing Number

18-01-2026

Filing Number

368/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

10-District Judge - 02

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section RECOVERY

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S JAIVAT CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.

    Adv. Juhi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S C.L. MICROMED PVT. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint and returned the suit under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC to the appropriate lower court. The court held that the claim for Rs.4,34,224 was partially barred by limitation—the invoice dated 20.08.2021 claim was time-barred, but only the claim for Rs.2,65,500 based on the invoice dated 21.01.2023 could proceed as it fell within the civil judge's pecuniary jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge - 02

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases

    District Judge - 02

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint and returned the suit under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC to the appropriate lower court. The court held that the claim for Rs.4,34,224 was partially barred by limitation—the invoice dated 20.08.2021 claim was time-barred, but only the claim for Rs.2,65,500 based on the invoice dated 21.01.2023 could proceed as it fell within the civil judge's pecuniary jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case