POONAM (FATEL) vs SANTU RAY — 1147/2024
Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 140. Status: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
M A C T - M.A.C.T.
CNR: DLNW010122562024
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
6654/2024
Filing Date
16-12-2024
Registration No
1147/2024
Registration Date
17-12-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC
Judge
430-ADJ1(NW)/MACT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
POONAM (FATEL)
Adv. SI PRAVIN SINGH
Respondent(s)
SANTU RAY
Hearing History
Judge: 430-ADJ1(NW)/MACT
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 22-03-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 19-03-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 10-01-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: POONAM (FATEL) v. SANTU RAY (1147/2024) In this MACT (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) case, the court allowed the petitioner's application to summon witnesses, including eye witness Satish Kumar and records from Union Bank of India. The Local Commissioner was directed to conclude evidence from both parties and file a report by 07.07.2026. The case remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: POONAM (FATEL) v. SANTU RAY (1147/2024) In this MACT (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) case, the court allowed the petitioner's application to summon witnesses, including eye witness Satish Kumar and records from Union Bank of India. The Local Commissioner was directed to conclude evidence from both parties and file a report by 07.07.2026. The case remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts