SUMIT vs RAKESH GUPTA — 870/2025
Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 140. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 05th June 2026.
M A C T - M.A.C.T.
CNR: DLNW010104872025
Filing Number
6286/2025
Filing Date
27-09-2025
Registration No
870/2025
Registration Date
06-10-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC
Judge
430-ADJ1(NW)/MACT
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMIT
Respondent(s)
RAKESH GUPTA
Hearing History
Judge: 430-ADJ1(NW)/MACT
Disposed
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 23-02-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 19-01-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: SUMIT v. RAKESH GUPTA (870/2025) The MACT (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) dismissed the Disability Assessment Report (DAR) filed by petitioner Sumit in default on 05.06.2026. Despite multiple hearings scheduled throughout the day and repeated calls, neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared before the tribunal, demonstrating a lack of interest in pursuing the claim. The court concluded that the petitioner had abandoned the case and dismissed the DAR accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: SUMIT v. RAKESH GUPTA (870/2025) The MACT (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) dismissed the Disability Assessment Report (DAR) filed by petitioner Sumit in default on 05.06.2026. Despite multiple hearings scheduled throughout the day and repeated calls, neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared before the tribunal, demonstrating a lack of interest in pursuing the claim. The court concluded that the petitioner had abandoned the case and dismissed the DAR accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts