ARYAN vs RAKESH GUPTA — 869/2025
Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 140. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 05th June 2026.
M A C T - M.A.C.T.
CNR: DLNW010104862025
Filing Number
6285/2025
Filing Date
27-Sep-2025
Registration No
869/2025
Registration Date
06-Oct-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC
Judge
430-Adj1(nw)/MACT
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAKESH GUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
Case 869/2025 Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) dismissed petitioner Aryan's claim petition (DAR) in default on 05.06.2026. Despite appearing only on the first hearing date, Aryan failed to appear in subsequent proceedings despite repeated calls, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the claim. The tribunal concluded the petitioner abandoned the case and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Disposed
Adj1(nw)/MACT
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Adj1(nw)/MACT
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Misc./ Appearance
Adj1(nw)/MACT
-
23-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Misc./ Appearance
Adj1(nw)/MACT
-
19-Jan-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
Misc./ Appearance
Adj1(nw)/MACT
-
25-Nov-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Adj1(nw)/MACT
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 869/2025
Case 869/2025 Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) dismissed petitioner Aryan's claim petition (DAR) in default on 05.06.2026. Despite appearing only on the first hearing date, Aryan failed to appear in subsequent proceedings despite repeated calls, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the claim. The tribunal concluded the petitioner abandoned the case and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts