SHYAM SUNDER vs STATE — 179/2025
Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: DLNW010060692025
e-Filing Number
02-06-2025
Filing Number
2393/2025
Filing Date
02-Jun-2025
Registration No
179/2025
Registration Date
03-Jun-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC
Judge
432-Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAM SUNDER
Adv. Ravin Rao
-
2.MANOJ KUMAR
Adv. Ravin Rao
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Arguments
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
12-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case 179/2025 Summary: In this criminal revision petition filed by Shyam Sunder against the State, the court adjourned proceedings to 16.03.2026 for arguments on the revision. The impugned order was stayed until the next date of hearing. Respondent no. 3 was directed to be served through the concerned SHO, and the wife of respondent no. 2 was granted a final opportunity to file her reply, citing her husband's ill health. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jan-2026
Arguments
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
22-Dec-2025
Arguments
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
12-Nov-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
Arguments
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
11-Nov-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
Additional Sessions Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
Additional Sessions Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
21-Jul-2025
Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
03-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2025
Case 179/2025 Summary: In this criminal revision petition filed by Shyam Sunder against the State, the court adjourned proceedings to 16.03.2026 for arguments on the revision. The impugned order was stayed until the next date of hearing. Respondent no. 3 was directed to be served through the concerned SHO, and the wife of respondent no. 2 was granted a final opportunity to file her reply, citing her husband's ill health. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts