STATE NCT OF DELHI vs DEVENDER CHAUHAN ALIAS MANOJ — 569/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLNW010030552026

Filing Number

1548/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

569/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC

Judge

432-Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

650

Police Station

Bharat Nagar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE NCT OF DELHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVENDER CHAUHAN ALIAS MANOJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Bail Matters 569/2026 The court granted bail to accused Devender Chauhan @ Manoj in a robbery case (FIR 650/2025, Bharat Nagar) involving theft of a mobile phone, cash, ATM card, and assault on December 12, 2025. The judge found that since the co-accused had already received bail, the applicant's role was lesser, he had been in custody for over three months, recovery was made, and he had no previous criminal involvement, continued detention served no purpose. Bail was granted on personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-commission of similar offences, not threatening witnesses, providing updated address, and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 569/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bail Matters 569/2026 The court granted bail to accused Devender Chauhan @ Manoj in a robbery case (FIR 650/2025, Bharat Nagar) involving theft of a mobile phone, cash, ATM card, and assault on December 12, 2025. The judge found that since the co-accused had already received bail, the applicant's role was lesser, he had been in custody for over three months, recovery was made, and he had no previous criminal involvement, continued detention served no purpose. Bail was granted on personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-commission of similar offences, not threatening witnesses, providing updated address, and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case