STATE vs ASHWANI PANDEY — 537/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLNW010029562026

Filing Number

1504/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

537/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC

Judge

432-Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

259

Police Station

North Rohini

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHWANI PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Ashwani Pandey (537/2026) The court dismissed Ashwani Pandey's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. Pandey, an ASM at Dharampal Satpal Foods, was accused of cheating complainant Amit Gupta of Rs. 34,81,800 by facilitating a fraudulent transaction through Balaji Sales. While Pandey claimed he merely referred a distributor, the court found that only partial amounts reached Balaji Sales while the remainder was misappropriated by Pandey, with no goods or dealership provided to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Ashwani Pandey (537/2026) The court dismissed Ashwani Pandey's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. Pandey, an ASM at Dharampal Satpal Foods, was accused of cheating complainant Amit Gupta of Rs. 34,81,800 by facilitating a fraudulent transaction through Balaji Sales. While Pandey claimed he merely referred a distributor, the court found that only partial amounts reached Balaji Sales while the remainder was misappropriated by Pandey, with no goods or dealership provided to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case