STATE vs BIRMAND ALIAS MADU — 494/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLNW010026652026
Filing Number
1430/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
494/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC
Judge
439-ASJ/FTC NW
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
72
Police Station
PREM NAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Respondent(s)
BIRMAND ALIAS MADU
Hearing History
Judge: 439-ASJ/FTC NW
Disposed
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court dismissed Birmand alias Madu's bail application in a case involving abduction and firing. Birmand claimed he was coerced at gunpoint by the main accused Sandeep to sit in a car, but the court found the allegations serious—involving armed abduction of a complainant, firing two bullets in different localities, and creating public panic. The court rejected bail, citing risk of witness intimidation and noting that the co-accused remains at large and the weapon unrecovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court dismissed Birmand alias Madu's bail application in a case involving abduction and firing. Birmand claimed he was coerced at gunpoint by the main accused Sandeep to sit in a car, but the court found the allegations serious—involving armed abduction of a complainant, firing two bullets in different localities, and creating public panic. The court rejected bail, citing risk of witness intimidation and noting that the co-accused remains at large and the weapon unrecovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts