STATE vs BIRMAND ALIAS MADU — 494/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLNW010026652026
Filing Number
1430/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
494/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC
Judge
439-Asj/Ftc Nw
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
72
Police Station
PREM NAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.BIRMAND ALIAS MADU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Summary: The court dismissed Birmand alias Madu's bail application in a case involving abduction and firing. Birmand claimed he was coerced at gunpoint by the main accused Sandeep to sit in a car, but the court found the allegations serious—involving armed abduction of a complainant, firing two bullets in different localities, and creating public panic. The court rejected bail, citing risk of witness intimidation and noting that the co-accused remains at large and the weapon unrecovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Asj/Ftc Nw
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 494/2026
Summary: The court dismissed Birmand alias Madu's bail application in a case involving abduction and firing. Birmand claimed he was coerced at gunpoint by the main accused Sandeep to sit in a car, but the court found the allegations serious—involving armed abduction of a complainant, firing two bullets in different localities, and creating public panic. The court rejected bail, citing risk of witness intimidation and noting that the co-accused remains at large and the weapon unrecovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts