STATE vs AYAZ AHMED — 460/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 420. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

Bail Matters

CNR: DLNW010025122026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1350/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

460/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC

Judge

439-ASJ/FTC NW

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

Crime Branch -N.W.Delhi

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 420

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

AYAZ AHMED

Hearing History

Judge: 439-ASJ/FTC NW

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

For Bail

07-03-2026

For Bail

28-02-2026

For Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Case 460/2026 Summary: STATE v. AYAZ AHMED The court dismissed Ayaz Ahmed's bail application in a case involving the illegal distribution of expired chocolates. Ahmed allegedly purchased expired chocolates without proper documentation and sold them to co-accused Atul Jalan (who repackaged them with tampered labels), falsely declaring them as cattle feed and cosmetics. The court found the charges extremely serious due to public health risks, especially to children, and noted that toxic materials were used to erase expiry dates. Bail was denied pending testimony from food safety officers and given that charges remain unframed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
11-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case 460/2026 Summary: STATE v. AYAZ AHMED The court dismissed Ayaz Ahmed's bail application in a case involving the illegal distribution of expired chocolates. Ahmed allegedly purchased expired chocolates without proper documentation and sold them to co-accused Atul Jalan (who repackaged them with tampered labels), falsely declaring them as cattle feed and cosmetics. The court found the charges extremely serious due to public health risks, especially to children, and noted that toxic materials were used to erase expiry dates. Bail was denied pending testimony from food safety officers and given that charges remain unframed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case