VIDYOTMA TIWARI vs UNTRACE — 116/2026

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 FATAL. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

M A C T - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLNW010013222026

Filing Number

943/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

116/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC

Judge

430-Adj1(nw)/MACT

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166 FATAL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIDYOTMA TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNTRACE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Case Summary: 116/2026 The MACT court disposed of the hit-and-run case after the widow of the deceased (Petitioner No. 1) expressed satisfaction with the police investigation and consented to acceptance of the "Untrace" Driving and Accident Report (DAR) filed by the investigating officer. The court recommended the case to DSLSA North West for victim compensation as per statutory rules, allowing the legal representatives of the deceased to approach DSLSA for compensation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Adj1(nw)/MACT

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Adj1(nw)/MACT

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Adj1(nw)/MACT

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 116/2026 The MACT court disposed of the hit-and-run case after the widow of the deceased (Petitioner No. 1) expressed satisfaction with the police investigation and consented to acceptance of the "Untrace" Driving and Accident Report (DAR) filed by the investigating officer. The court recommended the case to DSLSA North West for victim compensation as per statutory rules, allowing the legal representatives of the deceased to approach DSLSA for compensation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case