BHAVISHYA SUKHIJA vs BABBAN SAROJ — 37/2026

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166,140 INJURY. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 22nd March 2026.

Case disposed

M A C T - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLNW010002772026

Filing Number

228/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC

Judge

430-Adj1(nw)/MACT

Decision Date

22-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166,140 INJURY

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVISHYA SUKHIJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABBAN SAROJ

  2. 2.MD AMINUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Adj1(nw)/MACT

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Case Summary: The MACT court awarded Rs. 25,000 to petitioner Bhavishya Sukhija (age 12) as compensation for injuries sustained in an accident, following an amicable settlement reached during pre-Lok Adalat proceedings. The insurance company must remit the award within 30 days to the petitioner's designated HDFC Bank saving account, failing which 12% interest applies, with the amount to be placed in fixed deposit pending court-directed disbursement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Adj1(nw)/MACT

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Adj1(nw)/MACT

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The MACT court awarded Rs. 25,000 to petitioner Bhavishya Sukhija (age 12) as compensation for injuries sustained in an accident, following an amicable settlement reached during pre-Lok Adalat proceedings. The insurance company must remit the award within 30 days to the petitioner's designated HDFC Bank saving account, failing which 12% interest applies, with the amount to be placed in fixed deposit pending court-directed disbursement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case