Jai Bhagwan Through Bhagat Singh Rana vs Union of India through LAC North — 636/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38. Status: Misc. cases/purpose. Next hearing: 14th August 2026.

Misc. cases/purpose Next hearing 14-Aug-2026

EX. CIVIL - EXECUTION. CIVIL

CNR: DLNT010169512025

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

12492/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

636/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jai Bhagwan Through Bhagat Singh Rana

    Adv. VIKASH GAUTAM

  2. 2.Bhawan Singh

    Adv. VIKASH GAUTAM

  3. 3.Kuldeep Singh

    Adv. VIKASH GAUTAM

  4. 4.Pradeep Rana

    Adv. VIKASH GAUTAM

  5. 5.Nirmala Devi

    Adv. VIKASH GAUTAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India through LAC North

  2. 2.DDA

Case History

  1. 14-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    In Case 636/2025, the District Court (Delhi) adjourned the matter on 29.05.2026, directing that the Demand and ENM (Examination-in-Chief/Evidence Notice) be filed by 14.08.2026. All counsels for the petitioner, respondents (Union of India/LAC North and DDA), and the DEO from LAC office were present during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 636/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 636/2025, the District Court (Delhi) adjourned the matter on 29.05.2026, directing that the Demand and ENM (Examination-in-Chief/Evidence Notice) be filed by 14.08.2026. All counsels for the petitioner, respondents (Union of India/LAC North and DDA), and the DEO from LAC office were present during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case