STATE vs SONU — 2286/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 418. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLNT010165032025

Filing Number

11033/2025

Filing Date

10-Dec-2025

Registration No

2286/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

431-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

523

Police Station

Mahendra Park

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 418

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SONU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Summary: Case 2286/2025 (State v. Sonu) The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Sonu under Section 482 BNSS, finding that the accused had already cooperated with investigation and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The accused was released on Rs. 20,000 bail with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2286/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 2286/2025 (State v. Sonu) The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Sonu under Section 482 BNSS, finding that the accused had already cooperated with investigation and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The accused was released on Rs. 20,000 bail with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case