STATE vs PANKAJ MAHTO — 2285/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 418. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLNT010165022025
Filing Number
11032/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
2285/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC
Judge
431-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
523
Police Station
Mahendra Park
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.PANKAJ MAHTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to Pankaj Mahto under Section 482 BNSS for charges under Sections 418(4)/336(3)/340(2) BNS, based on the Investigating Officer's submission that the accused had already joined the investigation and arrest was unnecessary. Mahto was ordered to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
17-Jan-2026
For Bail
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
11-Dec-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2285/2025
The court granted anticipatory bail to Pankaj Mahto under Section 482 BNSS for charges under Sections 418(4)/336(3)/340(2) BNS, based on the Investigating Officer's submission that the accused had already joined the investigation and arrest was unnecessary. Mahto was ordered to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts